by MARSHA MCKENNA | SENIOR EDITOR
A complaint filed by the school district and its levy committee with the Ohio Elections Commission alleging seven statements made by a local citizens group during the November 2010 election were false has been resolved.
No action will be taken against the Stow Citizens for Responsible Government as a result of the complaint, which alleged the SCRG made false statements during the election campaign for a 4.56-mill renewal levy.
The district and the SCRG reached an agreement just before the Jan. 26 hearing commenced that a violation had occurred with one of the statements, according to Philip Richter, executive director for the OEC. The commission found a violation with one other statement, and the rest of the complaints were dismissed.
The complaints were filed in October 2010 by Supt. Dr. Russ Jones on behalf of the school levy committee. In February 2011, the Board of Education voted to have the district join the complaint.
According to Richter, the two groups agreed that in a statement the SCRG made that the superintendent “took credit for the first Excellent with Distinction rating while the timeline for his hire can’t support any contribution on his part,” the use of the word “any” was a violation.
The two entities also agreed to dismiss a complaint regarding the statement “Five-year forecasts have been inaccurate and weakly presented.”
According to Richter, the commission did find a violation in the use of the word “ignore” in the SCRG statement, “The treasurer chose to ignore the previous board’s direction to apply for the Meritorious Budget Award, which the previous treasurer earned for the district.”
Richter said the commission voted there was “good cause not to refer the issue for prosecution,” meaning no penalties were imposed against the SCRG.
Four other statements listed in the original complaint were dismissed by the commission as having no probable cause shortly after the filing was made.
“While we are pleased with the findings against [the SCRG], it is unfortunate that we are forced to spend time and resources on matters like this,” said Jones.
In a press release, representatives of SCRG said, “Stow Citizens for Responsible Government appreciates the findings of the commission. Throughout the proceedings, which began with the superintendent filing the complaint over a year ago (process was prolonged by the district’s request for two continuances), the elections commission has been professional and objective. It is unfortunate that the district administration has chosen to expend significant time and resources, with such questionable benefit to the taxpayers.”
According to Catherine Bulgrin, the district’s treasurer/CFO, the legal fees associated with the OEC hearing won’t be available for a couple of weeks.
Board of Education president Karen Powers said, “It’s unfortunate that the school district had to incur additional costs” in the matter.
“My hope is that in the future the individuals involved will exercise better judgment and more restraint concerning their public statements,” she said.
The statements that were dismissed for no probable cause were:
* “The district has experienced a windfall in state and federal stimulus funds. It has benefited from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which the administration used to begin a new, unsustainable program (International Baccalaureate).”
* “Since experiencing such success with AP courses and ACT scores, why is the superintendent introducing the International Baccalaureate Program (IB)? The start up costs are prohibitive, let alone sustaining such a specialized course of studies.”
* “The complaint asserts that other references to IB are misleading.”
* “The district’s appeal declares, ‘Nothing New – Just Renew!’ But there is no substance here to justify the plea. What happened to the Five-Year Strategic Plan?”
http://www.stowsentry.com/news/article/5153504













